OperatorÉWould
You Help Me Place This Nightmare?
(The
Hidden Costs of Cell Phone Technologies)
keith
harmon snow
Cell phone towers have drawn minor criticism by
MassachusettsÕ rural hilltowns residents for their ugliness. Huntington (MA)
and Montgomery (MA) are two local
examples. Like the manipulation of local government and local peopleÕs control
by the mega-companies involved, this has been scantily reported, often putting
the corporate interests first.
Invariably, even the local newspapers treat the
issue as if the public interests were on a level playing field with the
corporate interests. Such is the corporate bias -- based in the sociological
effects of billions of dollars of propaganda -- denied by most reporters, in
the local newspapers.
The greater injustice however comes in
considering that profits-first corporations and their lawyers have successfully
hidden – with the mediaÕs cooperation – both the phenomenal local
and global public health and environmental costs of wireless telecommunications
technology. And towers just keep popping up, unopposed, across the Pioneer
Valley – like everywhere else.
According to the US Fish & Wildlife Service,
the American Bird Conservancy and many, many academic experts, cell towers are
decimating populations of songbirds. It is estimated that from 4 to 40 million
birds are killed annually, and experts believe that even these numbers may be
far too conservative.
Birds are already suffering epidemics of disease
due to corporate-dumped and federally approved chemical and radioactive
pollution, due to urban Wal-Mart sprawl, corporate-and US-government induced
global climate mayhem, and gun-enthusiasts pumping lead into the environment
for sport (in violation of at least four Federal statutes). With a 50%
(minimum) global habitat loss in the past few decades, our lovely birds are now
being slaughtered by the millions as their navigational senses fail to
negotiate a national landscape increasingly dotted with obstructional towers of
solid steel and hidden guide wires.
These bird mortalities, the result of
corporations like Sprint, Integrated Mobile Services, Cox Broadcasting,
AT&T, and American Tower, are in direct violation of the 1918 Migratory
Bird Treaty Act – a federal law that makes the accidental or intentional
killing of any migratory bird illegal.
Citizen concerns about tower siting practices
are echoed in a letter to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) by Fish
& Wildlife Service Director Jamie Clark, who wrote: Òthe [F&W] service
has concerns with the way communications towers are planned, sited, and
constructed.Ó These concerns were suppressed.
The FCC is totally under the sway of telecomms
corporations. The FCC approves some 5,000 new towers each year (50,000 lighted
communications towers have already been built). The Federal Telecommunications
Act of 1996 serves only the multinational corporations, which lobbied for it,
and funded its passage with millions of dollars of corrupt contributions.
Under the auspices of the Federal Racketeer
Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act, (RICO) laws passed in the 1990Õs clearly
apply to the corporate assault on the earth and its ecology and should be duly
applied to telecomms corporations by the US Attorney General. Instead, RICO
laws are being used against environmental activists who have mobilized their
hearts and their integrity to defend the earth against corporate economic or
eco-terrorism.
The 1996 Telecommunications Act in no way
represents the interests of the citizens of the United States. It both tramples
the interests of local towns and insures the ease with which a corporation
– which cares nothing about local children who might suffer brain tumors
– can manipulate and override local democracy.
Children? Brain tumors? It may not be clear to
citizens that the impacts of telecom technology on wildlife have been –
at the very least – suppressed. However, given the complete absence of
news reporting on the toxicity of this technology to humans, it should be
starkly obvious that telecommunications corporations and our compromised local
media have perpetuated an electromagnetic version of the tobacco industry
cover-up.
Radio and microwave signals of wireless technology can cause neurological, respiratory, dermatological and cardiac disorders, including hypertension, irritability, eye problems and skin diseases. Brain tumors and eye cancers due to prolonged cell phone use have been sufficiently documented. Most at risk to disease are children and pregnant women.
This has been known since at least 1949. There is significant further evidence that wildlife and farm animals in the vicinity of cell towers are suffering epidemics of disease. Even some of the disingenuous research sponsored by the telecommunications industry – designed from the get-go to prove cell technology safe -- has Òdiscovered cell phone signals might cause genetic damageÓ spurring cancer growth.
It is sad that the basic truths on issues such
as these are not available to the public. Even sadder is the failure of the
public to take the initiative to find out the facts for themselves.
The idea that cell phones offer greater benefits
than they do risks is predominantly based on ignorance, arrogance and
unconsciousness. Yes, in an emergency, a cell phone is important. But ours is a
society where U.S. citizens – mostly people of affluence – motor
around in luxury, with the fanciest of gadgets, unconcerned about the genocide
being waged for their petrol, rubber, or metals, or the toxic emissions (from
their tailpipes) causing global climatic mayhem, which affects all life.
Indeed, much of the conspicuous American
consumption of resources is for entertainment, recreation or leisure. While
government serves the corporations, and neither regulates equitably nor
honestly the corporate plunder, the media plays dumb, remains silent, or
actively covers for them. (SpringfieldÕs
KIX radio station, for example, in July ran a ÒnewsÓ feature that
described organic farming as a scam.) And the individual goes to profound lengths
– acting like a spoiled or wounded child – to justify his or her
selfish, arrogant behavior. It is time people took responsibility for their
lifestyles.
Local government officials, select and health
boards, and education officials would be wise to stop assuming the commonly
held position of ÒneutralityÓ – suggesting, like the media, that
multinational corporations and the general public share a level playing field.
To be ÒneutralÓ or ÒimpartialÓ is impossible in a society based on profits
first, environment and people last, where corporations and lawyers dictate the
most commonly held perspectives, who wield power and fear in their last resort
to the corporate agenda.
ÒWe remind our elected Selectman,Ó wrote
Huntington residents Nancy & John Kaminski, and Deborah & Jeffrey
Wyand, in a May letter to Country Journal, Òyour primary
obligation and responsibility is to the citizens of this town, not to the
Federal government, and not to American Tower or Sprint. Your decisions should
be based upon the benefit to and safety of the town residents.Ó
We have exceeded the limits to growth. Select
boards and local newspapers continue to behave as if it were business as usual.
If our local government officials do not serve the best interests of our towns,
and they are NOT serving the best interests of our towns, we must replace them
swiftly and decisively.
This is really the beginning, and not the end,
of the hidden story of cell-phones. Indeed, note that over 80% of the worldÕs
supply of columbium-tantalite comes from private western interests perpetuating
war in Congo/Zaire, where the US is one of the leading arms suppliers, and over
3 million people have been killed since 1998. Columbium-tantalite – or coltan – is a major raw
material essential for the manufacture of cell phones.
keith
snow has BSEE and MSEE degrees from the University of Massachusetts,
specializing in microwaves and antennas. Formerly a manager for GE Aerospace
Electronics Laboratories, he has had four (microwave) research articles
published in the journals of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics
Engineers (IEEE).